The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The images illustrate how to access a given city hospital between 2007 and 2010.
As can be seen in the diagrams, there is a significant upgrade from 2007 to 2010 so it can provide more spaces to park both public and staff cars and an additional bus station for public transport.
Looking at the diagrams in more detail, the car park in 2007 was for both staff and public cars. In 2010, the old car park was dedicated only to staff cars and an additional public car park was added in the east of the city hospital. In addition to this, two roundabouts were added in 2010, one in front of the city hospital and one at the crossroad of City Road and Hospital Road.
To provide more accommodation for public transport, seven bus stops in 2007 were removed and a new bus station was added on the opposite side of the staff car park in 2010. The bus station can access the two added roundabouts in the Nord-East and South-East entrances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in English and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 90
- The process of producing edible oils and fats and margarine 78
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps show Tilden Airport and the surrounding area in 1985 and 2015 Write a report for university lecturer summarizing the information shown in the maps 64
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45348837209 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43223462654 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459302325581 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4172119326 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15564848306 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959447967839 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795078308936 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119647029617 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688177791072 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45348837209 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43223462654 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459302325581 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4172119326 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15564848306 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959447967839 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795078308936 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119647029617 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688177791072 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.