The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate how many students in classes there were in primary schools in four different Australian states in the year 2010.
Overall, the class size from 21-25 students was the most prevalent one in four states, except for in South Australia, while the number of students from 30 students or over was not popular in classes. In addition, among the four states, Australia Capital Territory had the highest number of classes from 21-25 participants.
In New South Wales, there were 37% of classes from 21-25 students, while only 26% of classes had 20 students or fewer in this state. Furthermore, the figures for 26-30 students in New South Wales and 21-25 students in South Australia had was similar, at 33% each. In South Australia, 20 students or fewer was the popular size of classes, at 35%, while around 28% of classes from 26-30 participants. In addition, classes with 30 students or over was the least popular size of classes, accounting only 4% in two states.
Regarding to remained states, in Australia Capital Territory, 26-30 students and 20 students or fewer were the most popular class size in this state, substituting at 51% and 38%. Meanwhile, the class size from 26-20 students and 21-25 students had the most popularity in Western Australia, at 42% and 26%, respectively. Meanwhile, in Australia Capital Territory the number of students from 21-25 participants accounted for one-tenth in the chart. Most noticeably, only 1% of classes with 30 students or more. Meanwhile, the figure for 20 students or fewer and 30 students or more accounted for only 26% and 5% in Western Australia.
- The chart below shows the numbers of three types of visitors to a museum between 1997 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree disagree 78
- The chart below shows the number of international applicants from four countries that a European university had from 2004 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...d 21-25 students in South Australia had was similar, at 33% each. In South Australi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01486988848 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69791681312 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.390334572491 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8390047304 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.416666667 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141235550299 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829224479838 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644839744085 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139919806844 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825772134767 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...d 21-25 students in South Australia had was similar, at 33% each. In South Australi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01486988848 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69791681312 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.390334572491 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8390047304 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.416666667 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141235550299 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829224479838 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644839744085 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139919806844 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825772134767 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.