Topic: The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the space of public classes in primary schools across four Australian regions in 2010, including New South Wales, South Australia, Australia Capital Territory and Western Australia.
As can be seen, it is apparent that the four regions designed their classes from 26 to 30 students was the most prominent. In addition, the classes which contained more than 30 students were less ubiquitous than the others.
Looking at the charts, in New South Wales, the classes ranging from 21 to 25 students made up the largest ratios at 37 percent, which was higher than the ratio of South Australia around 4 percent. In contrast, there was just over a quarter when it came to classes less than 20 students in New South Wales, while this percentage accounted for 36 percent, which was higher than nearly one-in-ten the ratio in New South Wales. Meanwhile, both the two regions stood at roughly a third in the class size of 26-30 students, at 33% and 28% respectively. Noticeably, it was witnessed that both states recorded the same proportion of classes with over 30 students, making up a tiny portion of the total population.
Regarding the ratio in the Australian Capital Territory, the most dominant percentage was the classes with 21-25 learners at more than half. Following that, making up 38% were the classes with less than 20 students, whereas the proportion of the other classes was just merely by 10 % in total. In terms of Western Australia, the largest proportion was the classes with 26-30 learners at 42%. Surprisingly, the classes with over 30 students in this state were 5 times greater than the proportion in the Australian Capital Territory. In the meantime, there was a pretty similar percentage between the other size classes of the two examined areas, around 25% for both.
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 84
- Topic The graph below gives information about the price of bananas in four countries between 1984 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Topic Many people are working longer and longer hours What are the reasons and Effects 89
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others believe that is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others think that the main benefits are in the world business Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, regarding, so, third, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 965.302439024 157% => OK
No of words: 303.0 196.424390244 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99669966997 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62119662466 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481848184818 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3601603429 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142129796348 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659636937919 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563907754397 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115162557389 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748570890404 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.