The graph below shows the percentage of people by age group visiting the cinema at least once per month in one particular country between 1978 and 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how many people who went to the movies monthly in a specific nation are divided into four distinctive age groups from 1978 to 2008.
Overall, there was an increase in the proportion of people aged 35-49 and over 50 visiting the cinema, with the minor rise being seen in the latter. In contrast, two remained age groups experienced a decrease in the percentage of people going to the theatre.
Looking at the chart in more detail, in 1978, among the four age groups, the contribution of people aged 35-49 and over 50 catching a movie was the smallest partners, with negligible figures of 60% and 40%, respectively. Thereafter, the figure for both age groups saw a slight decline by 10% each in 1988, before significantly increasing by 20% each in 1998. In 2008, people aged 35-49 and over 50 mostly maintained a marginal presence in the percentage of people visiting the cinema, at nearly 70% and 50%, respectively.
With regard to the remaining countries, in the first year, young people were the leading number of people going to the movies, with roughly 90%, compared to people aged 25-34, only 80%. In the following years, the figure for young people mostly remained unchanged before slightly decreasing to around 89% in 2008. Similarity, the rate of people aged 25-34 visiting the cinema underwent a fluctuation throughout the period, declining slightly to 88% at the end of the period.
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree disagree 78
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of unemployed people aged between 15 and 24 in five European countries in 2005 compared with the overall percentage of unemployment in those countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featu 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92083333333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67581438797 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545833333333 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6731072142 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.222222222 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222215610861 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10421212054 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446449163335 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148699391632 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165873722427 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.