the graph gives information about male and female gym membership between 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the number of people who join a gym club in two male and female groups from 1980 to 2010.
It is obvious that there was a downward trend in men's membership throughout the period and an upward trend in the number of women members at the same time between 1980 and 2010. By 2005 the men's group reached the pick and in 2010 reached the lowest point.
As can be seen, after that the number of women increased by about 1000 females in 1985. In 1990 has an insignificant drop and then raised around 900 people and by a sudden fall in 2000 decrease of nearly 2200. In 2005 reversed the previous location and after that by more than 700 people decreased in 2010. The male group after went up by around 2000 people in 1985, and from 1990 to 2000 decreased and recovered again then rose sharply to pick at 5000 in 2005 which by a dramatically fallen under 900 people in 2010. As a result, the number of men who joined gym clubs changed a lot during this time.
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 67
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 61
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable be shared freely Discuss both these views and give yo 67
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3027027027 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15918714246 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551351351351 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0595092628 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132085260052 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612826172758 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550857121185 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11480819157 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535487943626 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.96 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3027027027 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15918714246 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551351351351 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0595092628 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132085260052 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612826172758 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550857121185 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11480819157 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535487943626 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.96 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.