Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace every day. Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages?
There has been a colossal upsurge in prodigies discussing the topic of the benefits that working from home bring to us. In the midst of the technology age, it is apparent that an army of people can work at their accommodations instead of commuting from home to the workplace day by day. In this essay, I will opine that this trend tends to be a positive direction and cite some appropriate points about this issue.
On the one hand, it is evident that working from home is astonishingly beneficial for people regardless of their ages, sex, status, etc. People may have more time to deal with the workload and care for their families. Moreover, this phenomenon can reduce the horrendous traffic in rush hour, which can ease a huge amount of carbon footprint from car ownership. Furthermore, employees don't involve in a state of exhaustion or under overpressure. Without stress and tension, workers can cope with their workload effectively and efficiently even boosting their productivity to a staggering height. Noticeably, this trend is not hard for workers to follow because of the advanced technology. Finally, the government can be supported because people can abide by the distance law in the outbreak of Covid-19 disease.
On the other hand, working from your settlement can cause some drawbacks to the community. To be clear, it can create a gap between colleagues and hardly keep cohesiveness in the working environment. Obviously, it is difficult for the manager to supervise and control the working attitude of workers. Although the flexibility and versatile characteristics of this trend, some services can not operate without the physical existence of employees such as restaurants, hospitals, etc. Needless to say, cooping up in a house for a long time is not an optimal method for the worker to stay active but sometimes can dishearten their will. To illustrate, according to recent research, more than 50% of workers long for going back to the workplace because the home atmosphere can be a distraction which can make them hardly concentrate on 100% of their tasks.
In conclusion, each model may have its own demerit for the worker. Personally, I believe that the advantages we can earn from working through the screen outweigh the disadvantages due to its convenience and usefulness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | khngoc | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-14 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-05 | quytnee | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-07 | Awadhesh Mourya | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-29 | Diyorbek Zaripboyev | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education 67
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 93
- The graph shows the average Japanese monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white televisions and color televisions during the same period 67
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...m car ownership. Furthermore, employees dont involve in a state of exhaustion or und...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09234828496 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94344413598 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564643799472 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1096938512 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0555555556 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232758848693 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779103059755 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785183891337 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162989886482 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675134190877 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.