Today parents spend little free time with their children.
Why is it the case? Who are more affected: parents or children?
In the hustle and bustle world today, time intended for offspring from parents is more and more limited. This phenomenon can be ascribed to various culprits and from my personal perspective, both mentioned subjects are at risks.
The problem may be attributed to two main rationales. First and foremost, time deficiency is one of the most fundamental cause for parents spend little time with their kids. With the growing pressure in the modern labor market, the majority of people have to work overtime to improve productivity so as to achieve better position and higher salary in their job. Work in banking or accounting, for instance, usually entail heavy workloads which may not be dealt with during office hours. This has driven some parents to the edge of allocating less family time for more working hours. This is even a matter of great importance to employees that act as breadwinners, financial burdens have forced these parents to work harder to make ends meet. It is not to mention that parents also deal with a great deal of household chores, which results in accumulated fatigue after a long day. The second point that should be taken into consideration is that children’s hectic learning schedule spares little time for them to be involved in family interactions. It is lack of interactions in the long run that widen the generation gap between offspring and their parents, as a consequence, both sides would find it hard to have a conversation together.
Considering the long-term effect of this matter, it is my opinion that the situation may pose more negative influences on the young. Owing to the fact that children who are deficient in parental care may experience regular loneliness. In some cases, offspring are inclined to exhibit antisocial behaviour in order to draw parents’ attention, this can have a detrimental effect on their emotional development considering long period of time. Looking from the parents’ perspective, they may also have to deal with anxiety and depression because of not only the distance with their kids but also their kids’ inappropriate behaviours, hence, this may have a harmful impact on their work-life balance.
These are some of the fundamental reasons for why children and parents spend little time together nowadays and it is my opinion that children would be more disadvantageous in the given cases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-26 | phamkhuyen | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-06 | Linhharty | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | puson | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 67 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages 89
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 84
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 89
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...o work overtime to improve productivity so as to achieve better position and higher sala...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... emotional development considering long period of time. Looking from the parents’ perspective,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... their work-life balance. These are some of the fundamental reasons for why children an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, second, so, as to, for instance, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12628865979 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82545117713 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54381443299 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9076882229 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.3125 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349938991102 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113955094586 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995505786828 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233279071084 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747052933643 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.