Science and Technology have always advanced us, which has made some skills, beliefs and concepts obsolete and it is the principle of Science that with discoveries of new things some other things become invalid.
Technology has many benefits and disadvantages as well evaluating them will give us the solution for the increasing dependence on technology.
Now we are constantly dependent on technology to carry out day-to-day work. Like we wake up to the sound of an alarm, use microwaves for cooking, and perform daily work on laptops, and computers. This has made life easy than for the earlier generations.
Now banks have become digitalised which has reduced human labour required and is widely accessible to consumers at certain clicks on their phones. The early discovery of computers has resulted in this change and has benefited us a lot.
Manual labour is now a thing of the past as automation and machines have taken their place. Earlier industries required a large amount of labour force to manufacture products, like textile industries were filled with skilled labour requiring intense training to understand and learn to make a product but now machines have taken over them and thus eradicated the requirement of skilled labour.
A lot of old skills like traditional farming, textile making, and clock making are now obsolete. But technology has contributed to making these tasks easy fast and reliable. So learning these new abilities will help us understand the recent technology and get more out of it. Although we have forgotten some old skills and abilities, we have gained some new skills which help us better understand the technology and get the most out of it.
- the benefits of technology come at a price increasing dependence will result in an overall weakening of human abilities 50
- the benefits of technology come at a price increasing dependence will result in an overall weakening of human abilities 50
- technology is weakening human abilities 66
- When Ida McAllister ran for mayor of Lake City four years ago she failed to win even 30 percent of the vote But since then McAllister has made public her commitment to environmental causes She would be wise therefore to announce her intention to close all 66
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 276.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1268115942 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74746403091 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561594202899 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2878143735 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.846153846 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.76923076923 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14201056886 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054943112767 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590557868017 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824758822176 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682298512702 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 276.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1268115942 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74746403091 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561594202899 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2878143735 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.846153846 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.76923076923 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14201056886 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054943112767 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590557868017 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824758822176 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682298512702 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.