robots are important. Agree or disagree?
It is claimed that robots serve as an integral role in the residents’ life. I totally agree with this opinion because this technology increases efficiency and replaces humans in challenging work.
The main reason why I believe robotic technology is of great importance to human beings is due to the growth in productivity. Specifically, utilizing robots allows people to speed up the production and complete numerous chains of different tasks without any break time or relocation. This leads to the fact that factories could save a huge amount of time and maintain the process smoothly. A conferred example would be that automated assembly lines used in car industry, beverages and food manufacturing pave the way for firms to produce a number of products in a short period. Therefore, such development makes a significant contribution to enhance labor efficiency and production output.
Another reason why I support the notion that robots offer benefits to people is because of the fact that it undertakes difficult jobs which normal people are unable to do. Machines are delegated such formidable tasks, thereby preventing people from the potential risks of being injured. A compelling illustration of this is heavy industry including metallurgy and mechanics. This kind of mass production is operated at high temperature and involves sharp objects, which needs the assistance from technological machines. As a result, robotic automation is an effective way for staff to avoid hazardous situations and guarantee safety in workplaces.
In conclusion, I completely agree with the opinion that robots are beneficial for human beings. This is because it boosts productivity and substitutes for people in demanding work. Given this situation, it seems that businesses and companies should not entirely depend on this technology in order to create job opportunities for workers.
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 80
- robots are important Agree or disagree 84
- The maps show the change of Happy Valley Shopping Center from 1982 to 2012 78
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 73
- The graph and bar chart below show the average monthly rainfalland temperature for one region of East Africa 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...that robots offer benefits to people is because of the fact that it undertakes difficult jobs which norm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46575342466 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03801676773 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0155517765 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144493073569 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485230462351 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623816883388 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901596065706 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022271461545 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.