Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents. Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are numerous approaches considering in which ways it is the best to nurture a child. For that statement, it is argued by many individuals that children’s pastimes should be either managed by parents or decided by their own will. In this essay, both sides of the proposal will be explored and discussed why this should be maintained as a balanced parenting method.
First and foremost, as parents act as the ones who should hold a clear understanding of their offsprings’ preferences, a child’s comprehensive development can develop ultimately owing to this. For example, recognising that utilising smartphones and other electronic gadgets under a considerable amount of time seems to be harmful for their eyesight, parents can set the limitation on the screen time for their well-being. However, many scientific researches have pointed out that a guardian who is always being afraid of their own children might encounter some unexpected incidents and keeps them in their comfort zone, is labelled “helicopter parent”. This, thereafter, generates several unhealthy effects on their children.
Secondly, it is believed that the young generation should discover the greater world on their own. By researching online about a specific musical instrument, for instance, a child has an opportunity to discover their preferences and get the sheer enjoyment of doing what they love. Unfortunately, there are not many recreational activities which are child-friendly. At this stage of age, children might need to receive support from their guardians on the activities they should participate in because many of them cannot distinguish which ones are positive for them. If not, it might directly affect a child’s cognition and consciousness later.
In conclusion, free time activities should be organised by parents, yet sometimes decided by a child’s hobbies. I highly recommend that parents should maintain both styles of child-rearing and have some deep conversation with their children to determine which activities suit them the most.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-12 | muskan shaikh | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | vevinawynn | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Yen Minh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Yen Minh | 73 | view |
- It is better for students to know how to solve problems they will deal with in their future life Others believe students should learn how to find undiscovered problems Discuss both views and give your opinion 47
- In the future all cars buses trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicle outweigh the disadvantages 78
- In the future all cars buses trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicle outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 73
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53968253968 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1323923902 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2925429522 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.642857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349526443125 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113215255892 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754244710349 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221668867503 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053082889229 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.