The Chart Below Shows The Places Visited By Different People Living In Canada
The provided chart illustrates the percentage of different types of migrants and citizens of Canada visiting some places in Canada in 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable that cinemas were the most favourite places for residents while the fewest inhabitants visited theatres in Canada.
In terms of cinemas, the proportion of Canadians accounted for the highest, at 70%, followed by that of new migrants from nations of English speakers, at nearly 65%. And the number of people from other countries was the lowest, at 50%. Turning to the theatres, the largest percentage of visitors were the people born in English speaking nations, at almost 25% while the figures for the foreigners from other countries and the Canadians did not exceed 20%.
Regarding libraries, the proportion of the visitors born in other nations made up the highest, at 55%, which was higher than that of the residents born in English-speaking nations, at 40%. In comparison, the figures for the people born in Canada ranked last, at around 37%. When it comes to zoos, the major visitors were the inhabitants from countries of English speakers, at 50%, followed by the Canadians, at almost 43% with the migrants born in other countries being the lowest, at 35%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 52
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 78
- The diagram show how plate glass and bottle glass are made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Human are damaging the environment What are the reasons What can the government do to address these problems What can individual people do 84
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do u think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11330049261 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71340495129 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487684729064 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1390868255 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.75 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139296540597 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087581104179 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109606981054 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141424850188 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125069890788 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.