Given is the table chart depicting the percentage of three main age groups who watch different TV programmes in a European country in the 2012s.
It is perceptible that the 11-15 age group often watch cartoons, sports as the highest, followed by feature films programs that was recommended in the 15-20 age group. Finally, the group aged from 21 to 25 was recorded in news, soap opera, TV dramas programs as the most popular.
When it came to the aged 11-15 group, cartoons was recorded as the highest with 29%, followed by sports, features films and soap opera with index 22%, 18%, 17% respectively. With 6% in news and 8% in TV dramas being the two lowest indexes in the age group.
Standing at 10% in TV dramas and 12% soap opera programs which were in the 15-20 age group. The index 18% was the same rate in cartoons and sports programs, following that the news had resulted in more than 1%. The feature films were the most recommended in this age group with 23%.
Regarding the 21 to 25 age group, the most popular program was recorded in the news with 23%, nearby was 21% in sports and 20% in feature films. Following that the 19%, 13% and 4% were recorded in soap opera, TV dramas and cartoons programs respectively.
- The diagram below shows how honey is made in small scale commercial production Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Traditionally women play the role of upbringing their children while men work outside to earn money for the family Some people argue that women make better parents than men and that s why they should play the greater role in upbringing children Others how 89
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...recommended in this age group with 23%. Regarding the 21 to 25 age group, the mo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55656108597 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35642797686 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47963800905 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2445484253 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.7 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183199838447 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959176607868 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813668939211 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140972048145 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907816752294 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.