In this day and age, there are many who claim that study with a team brings merits surpassed demerits to indivual than study alone at home. As far as I am concerned, I partly agree with this opinion due to some reasons. So, this essay will submit both up and down sides and finally elaborate my own viewpoint for this dilemma.
To begin, both adults and children choose to study outdoors such as in a classroom, with groups of friends because of the valublae benefits. People speculate this might be due to the fact that the increase of information that people may acheive when they get on well with a team. To be more specific, when studying together, undergraduated can receive and exchange knowledge and feedbacks indeed, with other peers. Thus, youngsters get higher grades and it correlates to the better quality of schooling methods. Moreover, parents allow children to study with friends in order to reduce the level of autism inside their offsprings. In our daily life, "autism" is a common issue that every residents need to stay aware of, so, it is also an evidence that result in advatage of teamwork. Hence, teamwork also motivates people to both work harder and play stronger.
In contrast, there is still a minority of population decide to learn at home by online method. People choose this way because they avoid meeting new friends and connecting with crowd or strangers. Being in a quiet atmosphere without bothering anyone is a better choice for introvert to gain knowledge. Furthermore, we are now living in techonological development, so, there is an abundant number of sources to get accurate and neccessary information without exploring outdoors. Thus, it is lack of evidences toencourage home-lover to join in a group just to learn. Last but not least, the environment of classroom might lead to some arguments among teenagers or bring adverse consequences to friendship. So, learning online alone is completely better in some cases.
To conclude, having an opportunity to learn with friends is good. However, my perspective goes with the latter because I am actually an introvert, who avoid the crowd and also due to my enlisted reasons.
- Full time university students spend most of the time in studying They should do other activities too To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults aged 16 years and over whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- Many supermarkets are selling more and more products that are imported from other countries instead of selling food that is locally sourced What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The diagram shows the process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to fill land 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, in contrast, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02486187845 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83085560838 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8107283424 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7368421053 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208146920968 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622350532217 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608092322518 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116879797053 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322674793507 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.