The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
As it is said known commonly, machines don’t do what a human wants it to do, it will do what a human tells it to do. Keeping in mind this statement, I strongly agree that humans will always be superior to machines and they are just here to ease our tasks rather than replace or surpass our intelligence for two reasons.
Machines are stupid and don’t have a decisive mind of their own. It will only understand what us humans want it to grasp. Therefore it is us humans that need to provide machine with a specific set of instructions that need to be completed in order for the task to be finished as intended. For instance, a person needs to drive a car from his house to his office. There are myriads of things which the driver has to take into account while manoeuvring towards the office. He has to take into account the roads, the traffic at that particular time of the day, the weather and so many other parameters. Let’s just assume for one second that the car takes the responsibility of all these perils while the driver relaxes. It is still impossible for the car to know when to stop, whether there is an obstacle or a child crossing the road. With evolving technologies it is possible for the machines to learn all these things, however, studies show that a machine can never grasp the quality of feeling and decision that humans possess. It is the lack of these qualities that will never make a machine dominate a human.
Of course there are certain things that machines can do better than us: calculating numbers, repetitive tasks and the most important of them is doing all the tasks with a higher efficiency. That is the sole reason why humans created machines in the first place. It is easier for humans to understand natural language easily than numbers. Some of us can take a one hour to complete a certain job while others can take days to complete the same job. That is why humans created machines to eliminate this lack of efficacy and ease the burden off humans to repetitively do a certain task and instead focus on completing things which requires human intervention. Before the invention of computers, people used to do all the trivial tasks such as calculating accounting numbers, writing a letter or a mail to a friend. All these tasks are repetitive and take so much human efforts which otherwise could be dedicated to look at more imperative problems that are yet to be solved. In today’s world we can see how easily we can send an email to our friend who is located in an altogether different part of the world which just a few click of buttons. We can automate the task of calculating daily accounting numbers by using simple programs that run on a daily basis rather than doing the math ourselves. All that machines are good at doing is simply trivial human jobs with a good efficiency.
Some say that introducing machines day by day to do our tasks has started to cost some people their jobs. There were times when we needed people to make clothes by hand but now machines have replaced them, resulting in loss of their jobs. Even though it is true that machines have started to replace humans in some field of work that were a commonplace for humans, doesn’t it also means that people are evolving and automating tasks while reducing manual intervention? In conclusion it is the humans who have made the machines and it is the only proof needed why machines are mere tools for humans.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 66
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...rstand what us humans want it to grasp. Therefore it is us humans that need to provide ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1021, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
...ay’s world we can see how easily we can send an email to our friend who is located in an alto...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1122, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun click seems to be countable; consider using: 'few clicks'.
Suggestion: few clicks
...ifferent part of the world which just a few click of buttons. We can automate the task of...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, of course, such as, it is true, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2825.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 615.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59349593496 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97987886753 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50290016195 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455284552846 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 893.7 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9064052987 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.653846154 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6538461538 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350956917763 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106178580589 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983800374958 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237965983225 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665276628007 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.