Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
For a long period, arguments about desperate states’ response has been a hot topic. As many views claimed that it is acceptable to suffer with worse situation, I personally hold the view that there must be enhancement to progress present circumstance.
On the one hand, it is believed that there are numerous reasons to maintain and be satisfied with difficult situations. Firstly, a number of individuals cannot have opportunities to make their faith better. For instance, it is struggle for women who has been through maternity or raising pre-schoolers to find suitable jobs as employers are losing interests in this age group and, instead, finding for a brand new generation. As a result, these females must persist in dissatisfied occupation. Secondly, in conventional beliefs, difficulties is considered as permanent faith that fewer humans can improve it. This leads to perception resisting any effort to make a progress, which helps get rid of existing condition. All in all, traditional concepts and unavoidable states contribute to inmovable attitudes towards poor circumstance.
On the other hand, I strongly argue that deplorable cases must be tackled or improved through each person. It can be explained as long-term benefits will not be ensured if people agree with existing condition. To illustrate, health and lifespan are precious most to humanity. Without protection and curing to eliminate danger risks to these factors, people cannot be existed and continue their long lifespan. Furthermore, referring to social aspects, civillization cannot be developed apart from handling and reducing severe states, which are the most paramount in human survival period.
In conclusion, although stable attitudes towards struggle situations can bring pros to human, there is no denying that the opposite reaction of indivduals can improve not only personal life, but also the whole society.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-09 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
2024-01-23 | hau le | 78 | view |
2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 61 | view |
2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows the structure of a home smokery and how it is used Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons were relevant
- More and more people are choosing to eat healthy food and making time to exercise regularly Why is this happening and what can we do to encourage this 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49829351536 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98746151843 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665529010239 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2014124082 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904111687504 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027196397001 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253390638134 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0523780936285 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00466605787655 0.056905535591 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.