Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary
Wage has played a crucial role in labor market, some believe that high salary is more significant than satisfying employees. In my opinion, this point of view is flawed as both factors are crucial for companies’ flourishment.
It is understandable why people advocate to the view that enormous payment is fundamental for staff. This is deeply rooted in the fact that sufficient amount of income would provide workers with greater sense of security. Wage earners are less likely to be impacted by distraction of making their living and able to maintain their intention and energy in the workplace. In addition, lucrative income would give employees a wider range of choices when it comes to their own priority which is regularly restricted to certain perks and allowances.
However, monthly payment does not suffice to remain low turnover and the majority of workforce happy. While money may safeguard some individuals from hardships, their other counterparts may find other elements important which include job prospects and progression to higher career ladder. Ongoing training opens new opportunities for one to become a more well-rounded person and reaching to managerial roles could be a dream of many. These types of benefits would produce more satisfaction to personnels than simple financial rewards. To illustrate, salary may not be taken into account when headhunting human resources for management positions, job prospects such as potential of businesses growth and shares of firms may be of importance.
In sum, salary payment is one of numerous elements to guarantee job satisfaction. It depends on typical individuals and their expectations. It would be better to combine these opponents in order to retain organization’s talents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-05 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | mihir76 | 81 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | mirisphan | 61 | view |
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Most of our information comes from the Internet nowadays Some people say that a large part of the information we get is incorrect Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 84
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, well, while, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42124542125 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02435914627 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644688644689 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9766608534 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112356946712 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348667181155 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426279313628 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628384991131 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328232846868 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.