The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a
European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph illustrates the amount of fish and meat that people in a European nation consumed during a 25-year period.
Overall, the spending on beef, fish, and lamb decreased, while chicken overtook beef to become the most eaten meat on the diagram. There was a fluctuating increase in the figure for chicken.
Between 1979 and 1989, the amount of beef which was ingested was the highest, at about 220 grams and 200 grams respectively. The figure for chicken and lamb was lower and the same at first, around 150 grams. Chicken consumption fluctuated to 190 grams in 1989, and the lamb was just 100 grams per week. However, fish accounted for the lowest number with only about 60 grams eaten.
After 1989, beef consumption decreased dramatically to over 200 grams. By contrast, the chicken had a rise and surpassed beef and reached a peak at 250 grams. Around 50 grams of lamb was eaten, compared to about 40 grams of fish in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country Why do they think so What can be done to change their views 70
- Some young people like to copy the behavior clothes of famous people Why might this be the case What problems might it cause 92
- Topic Salary When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweighthe advantages 89
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75609756098 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42636960961 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3057932712 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.0 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121345564457 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503098065142 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481098963914 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890744559604 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046092193879 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.