The charts below give information about different types of waste diposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011
The provided pie charts illustrate how much garbage of different kinds was disposed in a specific country in the year of 1960 and 2011
Overall, there was an upward trend in the amount of food, wood, plastic and metal waste, meanwhile the figures for glass and green waste prevailed consistency and paper, textiles and other types of waste witnessed a decrease. Also of particular note is that the most dramatic change was experienced in paper and plastic waste.
Paper waste made up the greatest percentage of total waste disposal, with 25% in 1960. This figure, then, substantially fell to 15% in 2011. In the meantime, the figures for textile decreased considerably from 17% to 11%, while other wastes witnessed a threefold decline from 12% to 4% throughout the period. In addition, glass and green waste followed the same pattern, which remained stable at 5% and 9% respectively in 2011.
Regarding the remaining types of waste, 12% and 8% food and plastic waste was disposed of in 1960, followed by a significant rise to 21% and 18% in that order, becoming the first and second greatest figures for waste disposal in 2011. Similar changes, but to a lesser extent, could be seen in the figures for wood and metal waste, increasing from 4% and 8% in 1960, to 8% and 9% respectively at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-08 | tr_h.20 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | Zhoungli | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | view | |
| 2022-11-07 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | view |
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- The chart shows British emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart shows British emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...er types of waste witnessed a decrease. Also of particular note is that the most dra...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82378854626 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61742229942 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555066079295 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.1671045756 43.030603864 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 136.875 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204873530775 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858606906825 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064984022818 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135809486106 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520139671264 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...er types of waste witnessed a decrease. Also of particular note is that the most dra...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82378854626 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61742229942 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555066079295 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.1671045756 43.030603864 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 136.875 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204873530775 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858606906825 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064984022818 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135809486106 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520139671264 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.