The map shows a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce accidents.
The map illustrates the details of the present road system and possible improvements in the forthcoming future to decrease the rate of accidents.
Overall, the most significant changes would be on placing traffic lights and constructing a roundabout.
Presently, roads from the city and school are joined together and diverted to either side which makes congestion and is prone to an accident spot due to the formation of four roads. Therefore, traffic signals are proposed on this site on all four corners of the roads. Likewise, the southern side of low Lane Road leads to the forest road with a narrow diversion are planning to straight to limit accidents.
Over to the eastern side, a roundabout is planned to build at the centre which is joining the road from four sides such as forest road and City Road. For that, they removed the present diversion of City Road from the west and joined directly to the roundabout. Along with that, a separate road is planned to construct for the supermarket from the roundabout and removes the shortcut from the eastern side City Road to reduce accidents.
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, however, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment? 89
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that governments should provide subsidies to farmers to produce cheap healthy food Others think that governments should tax companies producing unhealthy foods Give your own opinion and examples 73
- the table below shows the population of three cities in 1990 the population forcast for 2000 and the actual 2000
- The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, therefore, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94623655914 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65123003454 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5980616494 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212087080686 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919731522521 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515851341938 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124807056359 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587883480766 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.