In some countries, having a place in universities means that the career could be guaranteed and students must study really hard to pass the university leaving examination. From my point of view, I agree that university graduates deserve to receive better income than people who stop at lower education levels. However, I oppose the idea that these graduates should be responsible 100 percent for the tuition fee at universities for several reasons discussed below.
There are two main reasons explain why graduates should have higher salaries than their peers who are less educated. First, university students must invest a lot of time into gaining their qualifications. Usually, an university course takes students approximately four years to accomplish and this is such an expensive opportunity cost because student obviously could use this time to run their own business, for instance, and make money very early. Second, graduates are perceived to be excellent at their major and play an important role in the progression at any enterprise. They can use specialized knowledge studied at universities to solve problems which a normal person is not capable of. Understandably, high payments are definitely appropriate for their efforts.
On the other hand, although there are some concerns that a tolerant policy of tuition fee could cause negative effects to the national budget, I still think that university graduates should be deducted from the cost of their education or even awarded complete scholarships in case they have good performances. Because without support (bailout: may i use it to replace support) from the government, it is clear that some talented students coming from poor families will not be able to across the financial boundary and might quite studying soon. I do believe that the short term loss in economy could also be compensated by the long term gain from a brighter future of young generations.
In conclusion, whereas I am for that university graduates should earn more money than less well educated people, I am against that they should completely pay the cost of their study. Instead of discussing about who should take the responsibility for this expense, it is more effective to call upon sponsors who have needs to invest into education to share the burden that exists.
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development You should write at least 250 word 61
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- Video records are better to learn about the way other people in the world lives than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree It seems to be an increasingly widespread controversy about the method of learning in people nowadays video reco 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... gaining their qualifications. Usually, an university course takes students approx...
^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s. Because without support bailout: may i use it to replace support from the gove...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, still, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22043010753 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83641260107 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4107526058 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.714285714 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305144011053 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994270683462 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896928017652 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187885066399 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744977255047 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.