The graph reveals the amount of consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with some prediction until 2030

Essay topics:

The graph reveals the amount of consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with some prediction until 2030.

The graph reveals the amount of consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with some prediction until 2030.
Overall, it is easily seen that there are many kinds of fuel, but the consumption of petrol and oil is the highest of all.
People has been using energy of solar and win and hydro power at the rate of around of 5 qualirillion units. This rate seems to change rather slightly during the period of 40 years from 180 to 2020. It is predicted that people will keep using nuclear solar, wind or hydro power with just modest amount around 5 units The percentage of the amount of petrol and oil used completely dominates compared with the above consumption of energy. In 1980 the rate of gen leyes of every was about 35 . It almost stayed the same for 15 years from 1980 to 1995 .And then it had a relatively climb from 1995 to 2020. It can foreseen that people will use petrol and oil at a high rate of 50 in 2030. The consumption of the energy which was higher than nuclear but lower than petrol and oil is coal and natural gas. Both consumption from 1980 to 2015. However, that number had the considerable difference from 2015 onwards. Specifically, there has had a rise in the amount of coal whereas the natural gas kept stay.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-08 Giang Tran 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s from 180 to 2020. It is predicted that people will keep using nuclear solar, wi...
^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... rate of gen leyes of every was about 35 . It almost stayed the same for 15 years ...
^^
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the same for 15 years from 1980 to 1995 .And then it had a relatively climb from...
^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...he same for 15 years from 1980 to 1995 .And then it had a relatively climb from 19...
^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('relatively') instead an adjective, or a noun ('climb') instead of another adjective.
...ears from 1980 to 1995 .And then it had a relatively climb from 1995 to 2020. It can foreseen that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars from 1980 to 1995 .And then it had a relatively climb from 1995 to 2020. It c...
^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'foresee' or 'be foreseen'?
Suggestion: foresee; be foreseen
...atively climb from 1995 to 2020. It can foreseen that people will use petrol and oil at ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 806, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol and oil is coal and natural gas. Both consumption from 1980 to 2015. However, ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43421052632 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31753105928 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535087719298 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8974599187 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.25 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340752305398 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137338250681 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.264679222919 0.0843802449381 314% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.401648434556 0.15604864568 257% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.425768556148 0.0819641961636 519% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.