The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries (USA, Sweden, Japan). Calibration is done in percentage.
What stands out from the line graph is that Sweden had a gradual surge in a century while the USA and Japan experienced many ups and downs. Japan had the lowest percentage initially and is predicted to have the highest population at the end by 2040.
Regarding to the USA, this country had more percentage of the elderly population(10%) than Sweden (7%), and Japan(5%) in 1940. After 20 years, the percentage of the USA and Sweden saw an imperceptible growth while Japan witnessed a slight fall. Again after 20 years, the population of Japan kept reducing while the USA and Sweden experienced a gradual boost.
From 1980 to 2000, the proporrtion of the elderly seemed to be stable for Sweden. In contrast, the USA's population stayed as it is till 2020. In these 20 years, Japan had a boost in population which will keep increasing till 2050. Sweden had a bit of abate in 2000-2020. In 2020-2040, the percentage will proliferate for the USA and Sweden.
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 67
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 89
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro Given is the line chart illustrating the average monthly spending on four cell phones in 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79381443299 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72646793087 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541237113402 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4141443789 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15053066893 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670913461619 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114528561054 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138026904793 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141287328935 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.