The charts below show the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000,2010 and 2020.
The bar graph illustrates the vast majority of magazines sold per head in five nations over the period shown.
As can be seen from the chart, it was clear that whereas the figures for magazines sold per person in countries A, B and C witnessed a downward trend, the opposite was true for countries D and E. The number of magazines consumed per capita accounted for the greatest among the five over the time frame.
In 2000, the figure for magazines sold per head in country B reached a peak of approximately 48, compared to about 47 in country A. The sale of magazines in country C doubled roughly in country D, at around 36 and 18 perspectively. The number of magazines sold per capita in country E bottomed out at about 7.
By 2020, there was a marginal decrease in the figure of magazine sales in country B, at around 43 in 2020. A similar trend could be seen in nations A and C, making up under 40 and above 30 correspondingly. By contrast, the vast majority of magazines sold per person in country D increased slightly, registering about 22 in 2020. Similarly, there was a slow rise in the figure for magazine purchase in country E, at roughly 9 in 2010, after which this figure marginal declined to about 8 in 2020.
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are common than small local shop Is this a negative or positive development 61
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places Do you think the advantages of living with their families outweigh the disadvantages 61
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 56
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 73
- when designing a building the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47767857143 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7051913846 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513392857143 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3839781931 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427111818828 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185867094349 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810068375351 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260226603686 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530335711872 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.