Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether the internet has helped youngsters and staffs to complete their educational and occupational purposes easier than before has become a topic of discussion. In my opinion, I totally agree about this idea as the internet brings several positives to both the young and workers.
At the beginning, students can utilize the internet as it becomes effective searching tool. In previous periods, looking for information could make searchers spend more time on skimming the pages and traveling to public libraries. Nowadays, thanks to the internet, any kind of knowledge is available within just a click of a mouse. Furthermore, students these days must store their learning contents on the internet, making it more convenient to share with their classmates and teachers. An example of this is Google Drive, which can seem like as digital libraries where students can upload and share links to submit assignments.
Moreover, the internet has facilitated smoother communication for workers, thus improving their work efficiency. Traditionally, employee has to work at a physical office, yet the internet allows workers to converse with their colleagues anywhere and anytime through video meeting applications like Zoom and Google Meet. To be illustrated, during the Covid-19 pandemic, online working platforms and video conferencing apps have created a new culture of working from home, which has enabled businesses to run while keeping the staffs safe from threat of infection.
In summary, the internet plays an undeniable role in both the young’s learning and the workers’ quality. This bases on its ability to supply information quickly and useful tools for connection and communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 92 | view |
| 2023-04-24 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
- Environmental damage is the problem of most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many factors motivate people in the workplace Of these money is the most important To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- Environmental damage is the problem of most countries What factors damage the environment and what solutions to it 84
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, moreover, thus, while, as to, in summary, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53256704981 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91194797253 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651340996169 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7063274087 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212144279508 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714209700581 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055739884705 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123018261607 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552927893274 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, moreover, thus, while, as to, in summary, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53256704981 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91194797253 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651340996169 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7063274087 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212144279508 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714209700581 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055739884705 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123018261607 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552927893274 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.