Traditions are about the past and innovation is about the future, and it has been argued that we need to let go of traditions for the sake of progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this? What role should traditions have in our lives?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Human society has always been making progress, which is marked by old things called "legacy", in order to improve and innovate on what we already have. Traditions are said to be the greatest obstacle to new accomplishments. However, I firmly disagree with this statement for some reasons detailed below.
First and foremost, our customs and traditions undeniably identify and differentiate us from other people from other countries and cultures. By looking at some of our traditional features, such as local customs, festivals, and hereditary jobs, people will know the culture we belong to. Hence, in an international society like the one in which we are living, our traditions and cultures considerably contribute to our lives so that we will keep ourselves away from the massive assimilation of one world culture only, as globalization seems to impulse and incline us to live the same way and behave the same way despite our origins. If we lost our identities, as known as traditions, there would be no cultural diversity to distinguish from one another.
Therefore, traditions and customs can possibly exist with modernity in parallel. First, the legacies inherited over generations must be acknowledged by the following ones as if it were a grave matter. They should be taught about the good things done in the past in order to appreciate and preserve them. Moreover, with our limitless creativity, combining old traditional features with modern ones can be a great inspirational phenomenon for both natives and people all around the world. For example, besides the viral music video "How You Like That" by BLACKPINK, four stunning girls have made their reformed hanbok trendy all over South Korea and blown a new wind of change in their fashion factory.
All things considered, I don't think eliminating traditions over future innovation is a must. In fact, people can actually inherit and benefit from them, as well as protect them for the sake of our unique identities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-16 | Md Mazedul Islam | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | Blackcytrus | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | mbr926 | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-09 | mbr926 | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-30 | NeutronnzZ | 56 | view |
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- Oversea visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007
- People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...her. Therefore, traditions and customs can possibly exist with modernity in parallel. First...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 26, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hion factory. All things considered, I dont think eliminating traditions over futur...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21118012422 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98029872185 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636645962733 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5400339842 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275429475862 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874464802365 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037915416515 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158537648672 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302592629495 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.