Traditions are about the past and innovation is about the future, and it has been argued that we need to let go of traditions for the sake of progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this? What role should traditions have in our lives?
There is no doubt that these days neglecting traditions and do things in a culture-free way become very popular. However, the question: will this have a negative impact on our future? It is considered one of the most controversial issues today. In this essay, I will express my total agreement that we should proceed without looking back, and I am also going to examine this phenomenon from both perspectives.
On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the benefits considerably outweigh the disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that large countries, which have gigantic budgets, rely on current circumstances rather than looking at the past. Moreover, it is also possible to say that those countries cannot stand out unless they think innovatively. One good illustration of this is China, for instance, they are open-minded, and they accept nearly every new way to do things and, unsurprisingly, it is one of the largest countries when it comes to revenue as they rejected the old thinking.
On the other hand, it is also possible to consider it with the opposing case. It is often argued that, in fact, not considering traditions will have a negative influence. People often have this opinion because they think the past is a part of the current era as it contributes to an input of the present time. A particularly good example here is North Kora in which, they say, has a sophisticated technology. This has some truth on the surface; however, it suffers from not only distancing the community but also it is isolated from the rest of the world.
As we have seen, there are no easy answers to this question. On balance, however, I am appealing to the belief that nations should not stick with the past, as it has little or no impact on the current and even on the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-16 | Md Mazedul Islam | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | Blackcytrus | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | mbr926 | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-09 | mbr926 | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-30 | NeutronnzZ | 56 | view |
- Some people think that the purpose of TV news programs is to entertain viewers Others believe that news programs should be educational and informative What do you think the purpose of TV news programs is Support your opinion with reasons and examples 89
- Should students be allowed to choose which classes they take or should they be required to take the same classes as everyone else What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to education Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 73
- Should students be allowed to choose which classes they take or should they be required to take the same classes as everyone else What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to education Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 73
- Traditions are about the past and innovation is about the future and it has been argued that we need to let go of traditions for the sake of progress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this What role should traditions have in our lives 56
- Should students be allowed to choose which classes they take or should they be required to take the same classes as everyone else What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to education Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is isolated from the rest of the world. As we have seen, there are no easy answe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on the current and even on the future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, moreover, so, for instance, in fact, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79936305732 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81834178694 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554140127389 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2551466921 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.466666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178297271071 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575261182234 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444148909716 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109535389278 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333797165811 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.