It is true that there is an increasing tendency for robots to become crucial in our life. There are several aspects of robots that can be deployed in the future. From my perspective, this is definitely a positive trend for the development of human society.
With the ubiquity and advance of technology, its function might be widened up. Robots can be used in various fields of life ranging from low-skilled jobs like household chores to fields that require professional and complicated such as space exploration, healthcare, and business-related job. In the future, these kinds of tasks are more likely to be done by a computer programme but do not need human intervention. For instance, it is predicted that in 2030, robots will replace almost receptionists. With auto check-ins in both large and small hotels, there will be a lesser need for receptionists in the long run. Nowadays, even in fast food joints, people can place orders through communication screens or tabs. With AI’s introduction, there is a good chance that robots can handle ordering and other related functions.
In my opinion, the changes described above should be seen as positive steps in technology development. It is commonly acknowledged that the detail and complexity of robot programs allow robots to do any tasks with high accuracy in a matter of minutes; thereby preventing robots from making mistakes and improving productivity and effectiveness. Secondly, fields such as space exploration and rescue can threaten human life and it's undeniable that robots' functions can be made use of maximum in this circumstance, they can do it accurately without any danger and even do it better than humans. Hence, work done by robots is a good move.
In conclusion, robots become more and more useful in all fields of human life, especially in the dangerous field of their accuracy ability. Hopefully, with the advance in technology, particularly robots, human life is more and more improved and convenient.
.
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What are the problems and solutions 84
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The picture shows the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What are the causes and problems 73
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more and more improved and convenient. .
^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ore and more improved and convenient. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16459627329 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9989918015 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568322981366 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9741321625 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280657516286 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934974577603 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507163290236 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179616180087 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829942172553 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.