The table illustrates data of the two primary school pupils, who faced the problems in 7 different areas during 2005 and 2015.
Overall, it is clear that in 2005 and 2010 school A counter more problems compared to School B, however, in 2015 School A had faced less problems to 2005. School B percentage remained relatively similar in 2015 as well.
In 2005, School A faced major problem in Following Instructions about 42 %, in contrast school B faced only 6%. Similar trend was seen in other areas but in lesser extent, for example, in Reading, Handwriting and Spelling school A had faced 22, 28 and 30 percent, compared to 8, 9 and 5 percent respectively. In listening skills, Verbal expression of Ideas and Concentration in lessons School A had faced approximately 3 times more problems compared to School B in 2005.
Moving to the year 2015, School A and B had almost similar number of problems in Reading ability and Handwriting to 2005, but in the rest of the areas the problems had been alleviated for School A. The major difference was seen in the Field of concentration in lessons and Following instructions 18 % each. Whereas. School B faced same number of problems in 2015, apart from the one field (Following Instructions) rose to 12 % compared to 6% in 2005.
- In recent years there has been a considerable rise in crimes committed by young people in cities What has caused this What solutions can you suggest 73
- Success is often measured by wealth and material belongings Do you think wealth the best measure of success What makes a successful person 56
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun problems is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... B, however, in 2015 School A had faced less problems to 2005. School B percentage r...
^^^^
Line 8, column 308, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s and Following instructions 18 % each. Whereas. School B faced same number of problems...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, whereas, apart from, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80909090909 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83665518534 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7015636549 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401209768119 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203370481708 0.103423049105 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12416679891 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301094831713 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700695816427 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.