The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates information about business communication trends in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005.
In general, there are two basic general trends: downward and upward. Regarding the first, communication by letters was down over the period, decreasing almost tenfold from 19 million to 2 million. Furthermore, although landline phones underwent significant fluctuations reaching the peak of 35 million in 1990, then it dropped from 25 million to 22 million.
By contrast, the number of communications by the other three methods went up by varying degrees. They were hardly utilised until 1985, with less than 5 million of uses for each type. After that, emails and cell phones experienced a rapid growth to final 32 and 25 million respectively, while the Internet had a steady ending the year up with 8 million.
Overall, daily business conversations made by letters and landline phone calls were the major in the beginning of the period, while emails, cell phones and landline phones appeared to be most popular by the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-26 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-26 | mary.ssherr | view | |
| 2022-08-26 | mary.ssherr | 90 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below gives information on the percentage of Canadians gave money to charitable organisations by age range for the years 2000 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main f 100
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK
- The two maps below shows road access to a hospital in 2007 and in 2009 56
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that competitive sports, both team and individual, have no place in the school curriculum . How far do you agree disagree . 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17543859649 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85842306201 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672514619883 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.579831206 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121038790189 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703578828981 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137763297499 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126689603333 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176361948862 0.0819641961636 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.