People are using a lot of online language translation apps Do the benefits of this outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

People are using a lot of online language translation apps. Do the benefits of this outweigh the disadvantages?

With the advancements in information technology, access to global languages by every individual has become possible. This development has plethora of advantages along with few drawbacks. The essay will scrutinize both aspects of this topic before venturing a logical conclusion.

One of the benefits of this advancement is less communication barriers. With the help of various online applications, professional can convert the text from one language to another with a quick span of time which helps them to understand the point of discussion of others without any hurdle. Access to literature of other countries is another merit of this development. Though famous books of all nations are easily available in different vernacular, still some textbooks are not available in multi languages. Internet helps people to translate those text into their native language. Greece for example has different mythological books written in Greek language which are interesting to read, and these are read by various individuals of different countries with the help of Google Translate. Thus, it is beneficial for humans.

Despite myriads of merits, there are few demerits too. Reliability on Internet translators is promoting mass not to learn new languages as people prefer to convert speech in their own language rather than learning different languages. For instance, languages like Chinese are difficult to learn, so everyone prefers to translate it rather than practicing it which creates a communication barrier in face-to-face conversation.

To encapsulate, Internet translators are a virtue for humans if they are used wisely otherwise this habit negatively affects the diversity of oral communication. Although there are some drawbacks of it, its merits overlap its demerits.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-30 aman kola 89 view
2022-08-30 aman kola 73 view
2022-08-25 aman kola 73 view
2019-12-18 kongkona 89 view
2019-08-06 Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar 78 view
Essays by user aman kola :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this text' or 'those texts'?
Suggestion: this text; those texts
...ges. Internet helps people to translate those text into their native language. Greece for ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, thus, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64925373134 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07133753914 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626865671642 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.617403559 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.933333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.06666666667 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186619325051 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554907658978 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452118322709 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100047700709 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170064755953 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.