All animals should be kept in the zoo. To what extend do you agree or disagree
Zoo has long been a hugely popular attraction for adults and children alike. There is a considerable body of opinion which holds that the zoo is essential to keep all animals. This paper will focus on the reasons why I partially agree to this statement.
On the one hand, what draws much of my attention is the development of the country. Needless to say, the appearance of all animals in the zoo is synonymous with a chance for people to see many wild species. In the event of this, there is likelihood for people to immense their knowledge of wildlife and also amuse. With this in mind, tourists are prone to be attracted by the zoo, which gives rise to the zoo’s entertaining quality. As a matter of fact, the more distractions there are, the merrier the citizens are. This makes it possible for the country to achieve development. More interestingly, all animals being taken to the zoo is equal to job creation for many people such as zookeeper, veterinarian or guard. On account of this, those who are unemployed stand a golden chance to gain jobs, implicating their better income. During this process, the poverty rate has the tendency to decrease. This leads to the fact that the country is able to be prosperous. For the most part, taking all animals greatly contributes to the development of a nation.
On the other hand, by no means do I adhere to the idea that it is unnecessary for zoos to require all animals. Needless to say, this consumes too much money for buying land, hiring workers and taking all animals. Under those circumstances, zoos are not certain to protect the large majority of species. As a result, in many zoos, animals are being mistreated as they are often provided with insufficient food and medical care, which has so far caused many animals in zoos to die because of starvation and diseases. It can be seen that this really wastes the country's resources. Eventually, it is possible that the zoo is prone to be a burden for the country. In my own conceit, the best way for the zoo is to keep only rare animals and ensure the greatest living conditions for them.
To sum up everything has started so far, the zoo is not supposed to keep all animals. It is strongly advised that people should take my writing into detailed consideration to guideline an appropriate policy on the zoo.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-09-05 | ntv2996 | 67 | view |
2018-08-27 | Dung nguyen | 42 | view |
- All university students are required to take history course Do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 61
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- Children should focus on studying or listen to music do some activities while studying discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66585365854 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67039757349 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521951219512 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4420670221 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1739130435 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8260869565 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244034140054 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692307726696 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489797110272 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149753122698 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344556750228 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66585365854 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67039757349 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521951219512 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4420670221 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1739130435 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8260869565 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244034140054 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692307726696 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489797110272 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149753122698 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344556750228 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.