Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that honesty is one of the most important features of life. In this regard, telling truth in any relationship between people is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars on this point. As for this writer's opinion, I subscribe to the idea of being truthful in your relations with people. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my idea is that you will be free from the future consequences of any kind of statement made by you. It is worth mentioning that when you tell a truth you don't have to worry about what will happen if your lie is unrevealed in the future. It is notable that when you speak a lie you have to remember that lie your whole life to keep that secret while on the other hand once a truth always a truth. Vividly, the mentioned point can only be reached by this example, I remember when I was a child I told a lie to my mother that my school is off for some kind of senior year's activities but later on the day when my dad asked me the reason of a holiday I gave him a different reason and my lie revealed to my parents.
The second rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that being honest in your relations will always give you respect in front of everyone. It is crystal clear that when you tell a truth to someone even it is your mistake they may get offended for the time being but in the wider picture, they always respect you. As a case in mind, we had a housekeeper, who broke an expensive lamp in our guest room. My mother asked her about it and she lied that she didn't know about that. But when my mother check the camera footage she broke the lamp. Because of that lie, she lost respect in my mother's eyes.
By pursuing the above paragraphs, one can infer that although there are some situations where you don't have any choice, in spite of that telling the truth is always a better option. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating: first, being honest can save you trouble in the future. Secondly, by telling the truth you can save your dignity. As for the writer's advice, I vehemently urge people to tell the truth in any kind of public dealing and relations. By doing this you can save yourself from a lot of trouble.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | sonyeoso | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | theprasad | 70 | view |
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 73
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 85
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials Companies that receive 80
- One theory holds that the Chaco structures were purely residential with each housing hundreds of people Supporters of this theory have interpreted Chaco great houses as earlier versions of the architecture seen in more recent Southwest societies In partic 80
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style and inde 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ong scholars on this point. As for this writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea of bei...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ntioning that when you tell a truth you dont have to worry about what will happen if...
^^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...sked her about it and she lied that she didnt know about that. But when my mother che...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ugh there are some situations where you dont have any choice, in spite of that telli...
^^^^
Line 4, column 374, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...h you can save your dignity. As for the writers advice, I vehemently urge people to tel...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, as for, kind of, by and large, in spite of, on the other hand, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.3537414966 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37856050898 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487528344671 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4784624885 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.05 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242533638368 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831582757692 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681485290036 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158284403365 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479013422376 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.