The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the diagram depicting the process of recycling plastic bottles into clothes.
Perceptibly, this is a linear process with multiple stages, which commences at collecting empty plastic bottles and ends at sewing clothes from recycled fabric.
The process start when recycled plastic bottles with various sizes are collected and soon after transported to factories, where they are sorted out into different sizes. Following that, they are cut into shreds, the outcome of the previous step are henceforth washed then left to dry for 10 hours, removing any unwanted substances or bacteria. The subsequent step is to boil pieces of dried plastic to its melting point, through the straining process, it is shortly afterward turned into thin lines. In the subsequent step, they go through the spinning stage, hence the product - yarns. After that, they are weaved into fabric and are thereafter sewn into clothes, which is the ultimate stage of the process.
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 56
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The chart below shows annual average spending on clothes per person in the US in 1985 1995 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- As we are facing more and more problems which affect the whole planet good relationships between different countries are becoming more important than ever before To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'woven'.
Suggestion: woven
...e product - yarns. After that, they are weaved into fabric and are thereafter sewn int...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26797385621 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48547814699 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2940996399 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149485535804 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772246661834 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685858515012 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135030750563 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402138054199 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'woven'.
Suggestion: woven
...e product - yarns. After that, they are weaved into fabric and are thereafter sewn int...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26797385621 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48547814699 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2940996399 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149485535804 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772246661834 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685858515012 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135030750563 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402138054199 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.