The mass extinction of animals has become a pervasive issue that some people believe the government should resolve, whereas others believe that people need to concentrate on the challenging question of human beings. I am of the opinion that we should put more effort into preserving animal species.
On one side of the argument, we must combat the situation of the human race. It is undeniable that the low experience standards of living could strengthen the issue about the essential needs of people. While industrialised countries have fully built their economies, developing and under-developed countries have not. This can lead to the lack of resources in these countries so the government should give efforts to this serious situation in order to improve citizens' lives. Moreover, social stability should be ensured by the authorities. Therefore, natural disasters, political events and the horrors of war are still a part of life so these need to be taken into consideration.
However, we must tackle the problem of the increase in animal extinction. In fact, food security is a major issue. Animals are an important part of the food chain so the extinction can disrupt the balance of the ecosystem. As a result, the common demands of humans do not satisfy the worldwide population. Furthermore, humans have the responsibility to prevent extinctions. Human activities cause environmental pollution, which leads to the disappearance of many animal species. The responsibilities of protecting the environment and animals rests with animals.
In conclusion, people must solve both problems in order to protect the animals and the essential demands of humans also
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in one country who accessed the news form four sources between 1995 and the present with projections to 2025 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of boys and girls in one country who played various sports in 2010 67
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3536121673 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09515045496 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589353612167 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4011907286 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264555725747 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712442403374 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071290298042 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170379750868 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619668263748 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.