The table gives the information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The provided table demonstrates how the distance one person traveled in some different means of transport changed yearly from 1985 to 2000, measured in miles.
Overall, there were upward trends seen in the number of miles a person commuted by car, local distance bus, train, taxi, and other, while the period given saw a general decline in those figures for the others. Moreover, the distance traveled by a citizen by car each year was the highest over the period shown.
Specifically, in 1985, car was the most common means of transport, with 3199 miles traveled by a person, before soaring to 4806 miles in 2000, followed by that figure for other transportation, which rose from 450 to 585 miles.
On the contrary, traveling by local bus and on foot by one person each year decreased noticeably through the given period, from 429 and 255 to 274 and 237 miles respectively. How many miles a cyclist traveled annually dropped slightly from 51 miles in 2985 to 41 miles in 2000, which was the lowest figure shown in the table.
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for a country while some think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 56
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 67
- Topic The number of people who choose to get married is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 74
- Some people say that it is impossible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The maps below compare two floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79213483146 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49676599308 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.0599155706 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.166666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127946450638 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745029346728 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067799294275 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979583741997 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706483324822 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.