Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The ability to write well is more important than that of speaking?
What is supposed to be the major elements that make up one’s overall quality? The answer lies in those essential skills that anyone who dreams of a bright future ought to be equipped with. Among these abilities, both speaking and writing are to be emphasized. A general controversy rises up when the two are presented together. Some people attach great importance to speaking than writing, while others hold the opposite attitude. In my view, speaking is no less important than writing.
On the one hand, a competent speaker is able to communicate to others with ease. Thus, understanding can be achieved, and the circle of friendship can be broadened and strengthened. The careful choice of words while speaking helps determine one’s communication abilities. No one wishes to make friends with those who are poor at speaking. In most cases, improper remarks may considerably hurt others’ feelings. Therefore, in order to be welcomed by others, it is imperative to improve one’s oral expressions. For example, my roommate Linda used to be a bad speaker. For the first two years in college, she had very few friends and led a lonely life. As soon as she realized the importance of speaking, she chose to enroll on a relevant training course. Her efforts finally paid off. Before graduation, she boasted a large number of close friends.
On the other hand, the significance of a person’s writing ability also is mentioned. Excellent writing skills do not merely ensure one’s academic and professional success, but also help produce far-reaching influences in society, maybe even making history. To illustrate, for students, good writing ability helps them obtain high marks on the examination paper. For graduate students, completing a satisfactory thesis means they will be granted a dream academic degree or reward. For a white-collar worker, having the competence to draft articles may be an important steppingstone leading toward promotion and career success. As for professional writer, their popular works record essences of history and might be regarded as milestones for an age. For example, we may cite the story of Lu Xun, who compared the pen to a weapon. By expressing his sharp viewpoints about society, he made the world aware of the social reality of the time. The same is true with any other masterpieces to be eternally cherished and memorized.
In conclusion, there should be no prejudice against either of these two basic skills. As long as our society continues to progress, the demand for talent in comprehensive skills will be on the rise. Both speaking and writing abilities are critical to one’s overall development and each one deserves our ever-lasting attention.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Newspapers and magazines are the best ways to learn about a foreign country 63
- Many organizations try to draw people s attention to serious problems such as climate change or poverty These organizations often use images photographs and videos to motivate people to take action against those problems Some organizations use sad images 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 90
- In modern days parents can learn more from their children than children can learn from their parents 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 815, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...aid off. Before graduation, she boasted a large number of close friends. On the other hand, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, in most cases, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19634703196 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92505228338 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9173244405 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.4827586207 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1034482759 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1724137931 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134790748553 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361277355151 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467125187874 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891340154217 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426186433333 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.