Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
There is no shortage of opinions on correcting mistakes of the teacher or the meeting leader right away or after class or even saying nothing about it. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely choose to wait until the class or meeting is over to discuss about the mistakes with them. I feel this way for two main reasons which I would be exploring in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, listening to the leaders’ or teachers’ presentations completely is a sign of respect. As we are educated by our parents to look up to the seniors wherever we go to leave some good impressions on them. Some people might think we are impolite if we interrupt their speech and we might also embarrass them in front of others. My personal experience is a great example. My strict-rule grandmother does not like her children interfering with her in the middle of the sentence. If we did, we would be scolded and grounded for a whole week. Sometimes this is due to the old culture of the society so we might as well follow them to please them. Hence, correcting peers after class is definitely a polite way.
Besides, correcting them in the middle of the presentation might lead them to forget their next lines. Panicking in front of the audience is really common to every individual no matter how old you are. As you get anxious, you would definitely forget what your next point is if there is a sudden alteration plan. Drawing from my own experience, I was quite nervous during my thesis defense as the audience would stare at me while I was presenting my work. Suddenly, my professor raised a question that I had not thought through during my rehearsals. In the end, I was lost of words as my brain went exactly blank after answering the ultimate furious questions. Therefore, interrupting others' speech is quite overwhelmed with disadvantages.
Nevertheless, there are still some debates about this statement. I could not deny that correcting the teacher right away is actually a great thing to do. Not to mention how chaotic if the students below received the wrong information from their professors during the lecture. It would be crucial that the right information should be taken so that we could score in our exams and answer your employers correctly. This is ultimately important as the importance of those correct answers would decide our future. Thus, stopping the lecturer as soon as possible would prevent those mentioned situations.
In light of the above-mentioned, I strongly believe that correcting the mistakes of your peers until the meeting is over would be the best solution for the act of respect and preventing them from forgetting their next line.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The knowledge we gain from our personal experiences is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 70
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, hence, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85838779956 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78495463147 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527233115468 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2393870548 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.36 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129383968652 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033373869191 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522010178532 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817193951044 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593093791411 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.