The map compares the advantages and disadvantages of two supermarket developments for the town of Garlsdon, which has a total population of 65 thousand residents.
To begin with, S1 is located in the countryside. Furthermore, it is not close to both industrial areas, most of the housing, and the most populated towns, which are Bransdon and Cransdon, which have a population of 15 and 29 thousand respectively. However, it can be accessed by both railway and main road.
To continue with, S2 is planned to be built in the town center which has no traffic zone. Moreover, it is between two industrial areas nearly central to the residentials and nearby both towns which have distances to S2 approximately 16 and 25 km, respectively. In addition, these towns are connected to S2 by main roads. Although the railway can be reached most of the housing very close to S2, there is no crossing with the main road, nonetheless, the railways go through the town center.
In conclusion, it seems that S2 has more advantages in comparison to S1, such as beginning next to the most populated areas, and industrial as well as housing.
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca Cola 78
- WATER CONSUMPTIONThe graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meatin a European country between 1979 and 2004
- Deforestation caused by human activity is happening in many parts of the world with serious results for the environment What do you think can be done to solve this problem Support you opinion with reasons and examples from your own knowledge and experienc 67
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89583333333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02478190215 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5539999782 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16543845206 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738229725165 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108325816334 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119395094032 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147245323949 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.