Nowadays, although our society has witnessed the unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, some serious problems including climate change or poverty are still earnest concerns among the masses. Some organizations are devoted to grappling with these issues, meanwhile, a general controversy arises. Some people reckon that they should utilize sad images to prompt the public to take action, while others hold a reverse viewpoint that happy images will function better. As far as I am concerned, I definitely concur with the latter idea, and what I believe can be substantiated as follows.
In the first place, happy images equip people with the methods to deal with those serious problems. It is undeniable that almost all people are good in nature. They are enthusiastic about assisting others, but it is enormously demanding for them to help others in professional ways. If the masses are provided with happy images vividly demonstrating how difficulty can be handled, they will be motivated to follow the mature process to give hands to others who are mired in trouble. For example, after having a glimpse of the happy images of a charity organization, I will grasp a more comprehensive and clear view of how the organizations function, and in a similar way, I’m capable of mimicking those beneficial behaviors to improve the living standards of the poor, narrowing the disparity between haves and have-nots, and curb further pollution, improving the quality of our environment.
In addition, it is conceivable that people will be more touched by happiness than sadness and sorrow, which will significantly enhance the efficiency of those organizations. Our human beings always believe in hope and those happy images tell people that our efforts will eventually pay off if we try our best to contribute to those charity projects. To illustrate, if I know the effects of some cutting-edge technology aimed at protecting our environment shown by happy images, turning the desert into a wonderland, I will divert more resources to advocate this project. If I understand that every penny that I spend on poor people will largely improve their lives, I will donate a huger amount of money to them.
Admittedly, some people harbor the idea that sad images will reinforce people's consciousness about the terrible fact, and thus push people to take more action for themselves and the future generation. Some sad images exhibit what will happen if we don't safeguard what we possess. Nevertheless, just because some people awaken their awareness by seeing sad images does not mean they will actually take further actions, owing to the lack of relevant knowledge and understanding about how to do and what will happen. People may also lose confidence in the process. These deficiencies cannot be readily compensated.
In a nutshell, since we need not only propaganda but also actual behaviors to improve the situations of all human beings, happy images showing how we can get to grips with problems are supposed to come top of the list and be emphasized.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and TV programs made in one s own country are more interesting than those made in other countries 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: children should be required to help with household tasks as soon as they are able to do so? 73
- Many organizations try to draw people s attention to serious problems such as climate change or poverty These organizations often use images photographs and videos to motivate people to take action against those problems Some organizations use sad images 80
- National governments can take a variety of actions to help protect the natural environment Which ONE of the following three actions do you think is MOST important for a nation s government to take to protect the natural environment and why Fund research t 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and TV programs made in one s own country are more interesting than those made in other countries 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... of how the organizations function, and in a similar way, I’m capable of mimicking those benefic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d images exhibit what will happen if we dont safeguard what we possess. Nevertheless...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2572.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18548387097 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87801554289 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556451612903 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.2772433081 48.9658058833 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.368421053 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1052631579 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255627680214 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803273269442 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553121037474 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145414786255 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695650819596 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.