The Sydney Opera House
Here the lecturer has spoken about the uniqueness of the Sydney Opera House, the concept of which was proposed by Jorn Utzon, a Danish architect. She believes that the Opera House is an extraordinary beautiful and a blend of art and architecture, engineering and technology.
Firstly, in the passage it is stated that the roof was the revolutionary part of the design and prestressed concrete was used in building construction. The lecturer supports this when she tells that the advances in structural engineering and new materials used was an unique aspect of the Opera House.
Secondly, the passage also mentions about the computer technology used for making complex structural calculations and models that the architects needed. The woman agrees on this point and states that the Opera House was a high technical aspect of architect and engineers.
Apart from this, the lecturer also supports the point mentioned in the passage that Jorn Utzon was committed to organic principles. The woman thinks that the structure design fits in the surrounding environment.
Thus the lecturer has provided few examples and explanations to express his amusement and surprise at the uniqueness of Sydney Opera House.
- Altruism 3
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
- Movies and Television havs more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 70
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed Instead they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 58
- The Sydney Opera House 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... engineering and new materials used was an unique aspect of the Opera House. Se...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...its in the surrounding environment. Thus the lecturer has provided few examples ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 192.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34895833333 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90876440663 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8281729836 49.2860985944 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235859779255 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969208652712 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944229479327 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137564794524 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110592012464 0.0443174109184 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.