Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think a positive or negative development?
As a result of traditional dependence on fossil fuels which has contributed the environmental problems, several countries have invested in alternative energy sources . I personally believe that current development is positive as well as negative.
On the one hand, there are a number of major disadvantages when people’s demands for using electric devices are building up significantly. The first drawback is that renewables depend on the weather. For example, there is rarely sunshine in the winter that means we are barely collecting solar energy in this season. Besides, it is the same for wind power. Winds also rely on the climate. Another negative effect is that not all alternatives is a safe energy source. There are many debates about nuclear energy which can lead to nuclear radiation accidents, pose potential threats to human and ecology.
On the other hand, there are more essential benefits than drawbacks. At first, almost renewables are safe for human’s health and friendly with environment. For example, alternative energy sources are wind, solar power and hydropower that do not release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. In contrast, fossil fuels such are used to produce energy such as coal, gas and oil which emit a lot of greenhouse gas that is the main reason of global warming. More than that, alternatives are not limited and expensive. People can exploit these energy permanently and the exploitation fee is more cheaper than mining fossil fuels.
In conclusion, the positive effect is more significant. However, scientists need to enhance how to generate the amount of energy and the safety of nuclear power.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | hoanggiang | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | minhthinh | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-13 | hang9815 | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | nguyen van a | 78 | view |
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 73
- Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy However in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Do you think a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e invested in alternative energy sources . I personally believe that current devel...
^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun greenhouse seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of greenhouses'.
Suggestion: a lot of greenhouses
...gy such as coal, gas and oil which emit a lot of greenhouse gas that is the main reason of global w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this energy' or 'these energies'?
Suggestion: this energy; these energies
...mited and expensive. People can exploit these energy permanently and the exploitation fee is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
...permanently and the exploitation fee is more cheaper than mining fossil fuels. In conclus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30152671756 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84204699637 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603053435115 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6143138727 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7058823529 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4117647059 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310033085844 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736153847357 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790872253002 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171062273003 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771822212555 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.