The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of weekly income earned by families in one country was used for different kind of purposes in the year 1968 and 2018.
Overall, it is clear that the majority of income was spent for food in 1968, while families in 2018 tended to use money for leisure. Another noteworthy observation is that fuel and power was at the bottom of the list in both 2 years.
In term of 1968, 35% of income was used to buy food, which was higher than the others of the list. Ranking at second position, housing had the same figure with clothing and footwear, 10%. Finally, the share of money used for other purposes fluctuated from 6% to 9%.
Regarding 2018, standing at the top of the list, leisure accounted for nearly 23%, which was followed by housing, approximately 20%. Meanwhile, people spent 17% of their income for food in this period, which was 3% higher than those in transport. Finally, the income for other purposes was under 5%, except for household goods, 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 78
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, regarding, second, while, except for, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66477272727 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37529222865 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3133449409 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130876947931 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617889190064 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569799968284 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104101966444 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578672979988 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.