The bar charts below shows the number of visits to a community website in the first and second year of use.
The statistics illustrate how many journeys access a community site for use in the first and the next year.
In general, while the figure for the second year of use moved upwards, the pattern for that of the former year of use has some alterations throughout the timeline,
As far as the first month of the surveyed stint is concerned, the number of seconds per year is twofold with the first year of use in September, which is followed by the next month, the figure for visits a second year is higher than the first year, at 5100 and exactly 5000. Moreover, the statistic for the second year keeps a plateau twofold compared to the first year the Nov and Dec before the second year becomes the most common in Jan, with 16000 and 3000.
Thereafter, the number of journeys in the first year hit the lowest point in Feb, while the number in the first year increased slightly, with 500 in Mar. However, all the categories have a dramatic increase at the end of the period from 5000 to 15000. The number of visits in the first year has reached a peak, at 23000 in July. Finally, the pattern for the second year witnessed a considerable decline in Aug compared to the statistics are aforementioned, at 1300.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 67
- Traffic congestion has become one of the major issues in cities What are the problems people face due to traffic Discuss the possible solutions of overcoming it 89
- The chart below shows information about European people of different age groups who went to the gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 73
- It is said that people s life now is becoming more and more stressful What do you think are the cause of this What solutions can you suggest 73
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atistics are aforementioned, at 1300.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, moreover, second, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5504587156 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44245271976 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481651376147 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.762932222 43.030603864 267% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.714285714 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1428571429 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364407929439 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179435459655 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989985560945 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232814543686 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566216842199 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.4329268293 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.0658536585 244% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atistics are aforementioned, at 1300.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, moreover, second, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5504587156 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44245271976 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481651376147 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.762932222 43.030603864 267% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.714285714 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1428571429 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364407929439 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179435459655 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989985560945 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232814543686 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566216842199 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.4329268293 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.0658536585 244% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.