Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, more and more students prefer participating in online classes rather than taking on-site ones. While there are some advocates of studying remotely, I still support the traditional learning style because it increases social interaction and assists educators to manage students' performances easier.
To begin with, students can communicate effectively while studying in a classroom by seeing each other face-to-face. A physical conversation will assist the learners in a group to discuss and come up with results faster and better than through a virtual meeting. Pursuant to statistics on on-site learning, it demonstrates that students are slightly keen on the face-to-face discussion as they can give out ideas easily without being interrupted by the wifi connection. It pushes their competitive behavior while seeing each other so that the outcome of learning is outstanding.
On the one hand, teachers or advisors can oversee the learning process and gives hands at the right time when the students need it. Online studying will prevent the teachers to manage each student's participation and it may affect their evaluation of them. For instance, when a teacher requires the class to have a group discussion, it will much easier for the lecturer to join in each group as a whole in a classroom size rather than accessing each group online multiple times.
All in all, based on the given advantages of the traditional on-site studying style, I firmly believe that it would be profitable for a class or group size regarding its accessibility and convenience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ill prevent the teachers to manage each students participation and it may affect their e...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, regarding, so, still, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2766798419 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93453173626 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596837944664 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5469152818 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242270753983 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929240753718 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442062837789 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136128389917 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537929262437 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.