Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Discuss both views and give your opinion
There is no denying that history is an irreplaceable field in any era. In light of this, the importance of history has become a topic of general interest among citizens. Some people believe history has nothing or little to pass down to after generations, I would argue that humans can have a clear observation of modern days through what history tells.
Some people give a reason why history relatively has nothing to tell people. An advocate for this opinion might argue that history has little application for life compared to science and technology. The world is being modernized based on the involvement of machines and automatics. Therefore, history seems to contribute little to this process. However, the definition of history itself is not only wars and conflicts but also recording all the events that occurred. The scientific theories and technological improvements nowadays are based on the rudiments from the industrial revolutions in the past. The first industrial revolution, for instance, registered the appearance of mechanical machines which ran by steam and water power had replaced manual labour and boosted production.
In my opinion, people can clearly understand the present-day movements via history. This is because people can comprehend the foundations, standards and roots of all questions. Particularly true for Vietnam, young generations need to study history to know how ancestors fought against invaders to keep today's independence. In addition, because the past and the present have a connection, society is improved based on historical existing relationships. Such history explains the birth of NATO and sustainable alliances between America and European countries. Therefore, people are not provided with the necessary knowledge alone but also appropriate diplomatic policies.
In conclusion, history plays a key role in modern society and also the future since it facilitates people having a more obvious observation about the current. Although people now tend to bias other fields, such as science and technology, history is still the core element behind those achievements that should not be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-19 | Xaxaxaxa | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | adamneyul | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-20 | 지아 진 | 84 | view |
- The table shows the average salaries in US dollars in five countries at different stages until achieving the maximum salary 78
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate Write a report descri 78
- Some people believe women are better leaders than men To which extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 67
- Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and that there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52887537994 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97517001626 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629179331307 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6063476921 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.055555556 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279120761888 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818322981089 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643864972775 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163352170389 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324489025038 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.