Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are some people believe that history has limited relevance to temporary people, while other concur with the view that past events can foster people's comprehension of the present. This essay will elaborate on both viewpoints and explain why the role of history is of great importance.
On the one hand, the contribution of history to the development of humanity seems vague. While other realms such as mathematics, physics and technology mark their account to the flourishment of human nowadays, the position of history in human civilisation can not be recognized easily by the public. This stems from the fact that history as a domain often appear within other subjects as archeology, architecture, literature, making the emergence of history less significant than it should be. Additionally, the study of history is not lucrative, restricting the attendance of people to the field. This renders the mass less aware of achievement in the study of past events in the world, in which monetary values are prioritized. People thereby being unable to notice the position of history in the success of humanity in many aspects of life.
On the other hand, history has benefited society in many dimensions. The first merit of history could be witnessed in agriculture. It is believed that the experience in cultivation of crops are accumulated throughout the existence of humankind. Without valuable lessons of ancestors from history, humans may be unable to effectively domesticate wild animals or fertilize their land. The lack of knowledge from the past for agrarian activities may spell the end for the survival of humanity. Furthermore, learning history can pave the way for the development of humans in the future. There are myriads of applications are being researched based on the past events or wisdom, one of which is the research of climate change relied on the record from the past. The past figures enable today's scientists to weigh against implications of the climate and find more practical resolutions for the phenomenon.
In sum, history plays an important role in the flourishment of humans in general. Even though it's position is eclipsed by other subjects and restricted awareness of people, historical affects could be seen in other fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-19 | Xaxaxaxa | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | adamneyul | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-20 | 지아 진 | 84 | view |
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- Many employees may work at home the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only workers not employers Do you agree or disagree 67
- Many people aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the causes of this How to overcome this problem 67
- Today news plays an important role in people s lives and news media are more influential than ever before Why is it this case Is it positive or negative 88
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce this problem should we discourage people to use cars 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atics, physics and technology mark their account to the flourishment of human now...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24450549451 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91752938633 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532967032967 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0558124167 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.055555556 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225323807378 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751674795879 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563027214879 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150113548819 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670369713738 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.