Some people think space research is a waste of money. The government should spend that money on the improvement of people’s living conditions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no denying that science is the core element that builds a civilisation. In light of this, space research has become a topic of general interest among citizens. Although some people believe that this field of science is a waste of money and leaders should spend these expenses on enhancing people's living conditions on Earth, I would argue that space science would aid people with fossil fuels and a potential new shelter.
Some people give a reason why the universe science is a waste of funding and that coffer should be allocated to improve living standards for humans. An advocate for this opinion might argue that cosmo is far too spacious and vast that humans are unable to explore completely. Therefore, spending such a huge amount of money on an unsecured indefinite object is wasteful while the earth still has concerning issues, such as famine and diseases. The expense to construct a space rocket, for instance, can erase the majority of famine on a significant African land. However, there are existing funds to address these issues alone, and the support from many nations, organisations and companies together would bring potential promises.
In my opinion, space research can benefit people with outstanding advantages. Such this scientific area allows humans to exploit the fossil fuels that the Earth is running out of. With rapid technological and societal development, some fossil fuels are overexploited. In contrast, these fuels on other planets are surprisingly wealthy, and even a meteorite could possess an unimaginable source of gold. What is more, to improve space science is also to seek the future of humankind. This is not for the scientists' satisfaction, but for a long-term vision and investment as the earth will be unsuitable for living one day. Therefore, people need another place to continue life, as Mar is the target to meet all necessary demands for humans to shelter.
In conclusion, the unconfidence in space research of many people is persuadable, according to what has been analyzed above, I am convinced that there is no regret once this field is carefully paid attention to and improved as a daily part of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-22 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 73 | view |
- Some people say that it is more important to spend money on improving roads and motorways than public transport 78
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people s behavior What is your opinion 73
- The chart below shows the depth of snow cm in a particular ski resort in Canada in three individual years 73
- Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 67
- the maps below show the layout of nature museum between 2010 and 2013 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...uture of humankind. This is not for the scientists satisfaction, but for a long-term visio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09803921569 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76407435197 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557422969188 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2525561034 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267767513859 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761196604988 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861067180477 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169625939534 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628595895636 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.