The table show the frequency of visits to networking sites by teenagers in a country in 2010.
The table gives information about how frequently teenagers in a particular country visited five different social networking sites in 2010.
In general, the country's teenagers gave Facebook the first preference for trending sites, and Youtube became the second. Meanwhile, Wiki and Tumblr were the least frequently visited by all age groups.
Teenagers spent most of their daily accessing Facebook, at nearly 40%, while the rest of the social platforms only accounted for a small percentage. The proportion of monthly visits to five networking sites varied from 3% (Wiki) to 14% (Facebook). Teenagers paid a visit to Facebook more than once a week. In contrast, only 3% of them weekly showed any interest in visiting from 1% to 7%.
Over 9 out of 10 surveyed teenagers hardly visited Wiki and Tumblr. The number of people surfing and watching Youtube and other blogging sites made up around 80%. By contrast, only less than 1 in 4 teenage respondents said seldom did they visit Facebook.
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the rate of violent crime in society Do you agree or diagree 61
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 74
- Some people think the cheap air flight gives ordinary people more freedom However others think the cheap air flight should be banned because it pollutes the air and brings many other problems Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles 61
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast food 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08641975309 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64762290109 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1318325034 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365323830465 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135108615175 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104946750276 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228070064109 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117737389979 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.