The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
The environmental hazards caused by too much consumer generated waste is a serious topic to be considered for the protection of nature. The prompt tries to address this issue by proposing to impose strict limits on the amount of trash accepted at a household level. I mostly disagree with the prompt for the two reasons stated below. However, I do concede that in some cases, the idea of restricting some specific type of waste at a household level might make sense.
Firstly, it doesn't make sense to impose a limit on the amount of trash collected because of the very reason that people would always find other ways of disposing trash if the authority imposes a limit on the amount of trash. For example, people might provide the maximum amount of trash accepted from one’s household and then dispose of the remaining in unethical ways. To be specific, people might start burying plastic waste which would affect the soil, eroding its nutrients. Likewise, one might litter plastic or paper trash which, when consumed by animals like cows, would be very harmful. In addition, one might dispose of waste in river bodies causing harm to fishes and other aquatic life. Also, one might burn the dry waste from their household which causes pollution and increases global warming. Therefore, the premise of imposing a restriction on the amount of waste collected would solve all the environmental problems rings hollow.
Secondly, when the above said limits on collection of waste are imposed, it might be possible that people might try to reduce their consumption of some specific goods which mainly lead to harmful trash. Although this seems desirable at the moment, lowering consumption directly results in lowering production of the said goods, disrupting the supply chain. And when production of goods halts, it not only has an adverse effect on the economy but also on the jobs of the people who are employed in the industries. For example, if all households reduce the consumption of plastic and paper to limit its waste, then the entire manufacturing industry would collapse, resulting in unemployment of thousands of people and hampering the economy. So, trying to solve environmental problems by solely imposing limits on the trash collected does not hold water.
However, in some cases, the idea of restricting some specific kinds of waste from households might make sense. For example, the authority could collect only dry waste from every household forcing the people to find appropriate methods like composting to dispose of the wet waste generated from their household. Therefore, in some cases, it makes sense to impose certain limits on the amount of trash collected in every household so that people are well aware of the consequences of producing too much waste and thus environmental problems can be catered in a much better way.
In conclusion, solely by restricting the amount of waste collected at the household level does not address the rampant environmental problems. However, in some cases, imposing limits on some type waste could be of some advantage by reducing the waste and thus reducing the harmful hazards of thrash on the environment. The protection of mother nature is a serious and long lasting responsibility of each person and would require constantly thinking of new ways to dispose of household waste and this issue should not be undermined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 50
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 50
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas trends and concepts that help explain those facts 60
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... level might make sense. Firstly, it doesnt make sense to impose a limit on the amo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 853, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he trash collected does not hold water. However, in some cases, the idea of rest...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2839.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 556.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10611510791 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67154752276 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428057553957 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 887.4 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5149078222 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.045454545 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04545454545 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 21.0 5.13820224719 409% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35400905901 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115261908223 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074508991304 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22018844473 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570221424151 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... level might make sense. Firstly, it doesnt make sense to impose a limit on the amo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 853, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he trash collected does not hold water. However, in some cases, the idea of rest...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2839.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 556.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10611510791 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67154752276 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428057553957 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 887.4 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5149078222 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.045454545 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04545454545 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 21.0 5.13820224719 409% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35400905901 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115261908223 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074508991304 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22018844473 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570221424151 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.