Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries, while other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen on TV and the Internet. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is irrefutable that nowadays, because of technology, arm-chair tourism through which we can see all the information on television and the internet, has gained popularity. However, I disagree, that travelling abroad will no longer be needed. In fact, I believe that the popularity of foreign travel will grow even further due to publicity these places get because of TV and the internet.
First of all, computers can never replace real places. No matter how real and vivid computer images are, they are only images and can never be likened to the historical objects and natural wonders that we see in real or even might be allowed to touch with our fingertips. The difference can be compared to seeing the picture of a mango rather than actually eating it.
Secondly, visiting other countries is a rewarding experience in many respects. For one thing, it is a good exercise. When we make the trip to a foreign country then we visit the places of interest there, we get some exercise which does a lot of good to our health. We generally go with family and friends and enjoy a lot. We also learn about the culture and tradition of the place. All this broadens our horizons which can never be done by the passive activity of seeing something on the computer screen. At the same time we also get a chance to spread the good points of our own culture also.
Finally, I believe that after seeing these countries on TV or the internet, our craving to actually see these increases even more and so we make efforts to go and see these places. This can be proved by the overwhelming number of tourists to these places that has been increasing year after year. At certain times, especially when it is temporarily impossible for us to visit other countries in person, we can get a rough picture of what those countries are like. However, what we see from a computer screen is, after all, not exactly the same as what we see and feel with our own eyes on site.
In conclusion, arm-chair tourism is there today but international travel will still be needed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-05 | vishal sachdeva | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-17 | dhruv j patel | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-30 | sumitkayshap | 67 | view |
- In many countries, the quality of life in the large cities is becoming worse. What causes this problem? What measure can be taken to solve it? 67
- Some people claim that there are more disadvantages of the car than its advantages Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many teachers assign homework to the students every day Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 87
- Nowadays people get information through news and papers but meanwhile are uncertain about the truth of these news Should we believe the journalists What qualities should a good journalist or correspondent have 70
- Some people think everyone should be a vegetarian because we do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...read the good points of our own culture also. Finally, I believe that after seeing...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, after all, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64738292011 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5578953728 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4123491337 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7222222222 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154270310886 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557635882807 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394964141589 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966024859907 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487220231507 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.